ArticleJCPP advances2024
Deepening the participation of neurodivergent youth in qualitative mental health research: Co-development of a general approach and the evaluation of its implementation in a study on emotion.
Article in JCPP advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Autistic and ADHD adolescents respond differently to upset in school: evidence from a new questionnaire co-designed from the neurodivergent point of view.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2026Article
- Annual Research Review: Improving school climate to improve child and adolescent mental health and reduce inequalities.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2026Review
- From Participants to Community Partners: A Novel Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) Approach to Autistic-Led Inquiry in Digital and Virtual Environments.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Situating emotion regulation in autism and ADHD through neurodivergent adolescents' perspectives.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Struggling to be heard: A scoping review of user participation in ADHD mental healthcare for children and adolescents.Scandinavian journal of child and adolescent psychiatry and psychology · 2025Review
- Article
- Participatory research in child psychology & psychiatry: Embracing untidiness to break new ground.JCPP advances · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There is a growing expectation that neurodivergent young people, such as those with diagnoses of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and/or autism, should play a central role in shaping research on neurodevelopmental conditions. However, currently, their involvement is typically limited to arms-length advice. To address this, the Methods: Development - Building on the track record of successful collaboration between RE-STAR academic researchers (ARs) and its Youth Researcher Panel (Y-RP), a cycle of meetings was convened to co-develop a collaborative protocol for the participatory approach. Implementation - ARs and Y-RPers applied the general protocol to study a specific topic. This involved co-designing and co-delivering an interview schedule to study the emotional experiences of 12 adolescents with diagnoses of ADHD and/or autism and then co-analysing the interviews. Evaluation - ARs, Y-RPers and interviewees shared their reflections on the participatory approach and its implementation, during interviews ( Results: Development - The protocol for the participatory approach gave detailed advice on how to engage Y-RP members (or equivalent) in the co-design, co-delivery and co-analysis of interviews. Implementation - The approach was successfully implemented by ARs and Y-RPers working together to co-design an interview to study the emotional lives of adolescents with diagnoses of ADHD and/or autism, co-deliver it and then co-analyse the interview scripts. Evaluation - The implementation experience of the Y-RP, ARs and interviewees was characterised by common themes relating to (a) adapting research methods and making practical adjustments; (b) taking on new roles, adding value to research and (c) valuing neurodivergent characteristics. Conclusions: This new RE-STAR protocol proved feasible to implement in a way that was generally perceived, from multiple perspectives, to add depth and authenticity to research into the experiences of neurodivergent young people.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.