ArticleMedical journal, Armed Forces India2024
Experience in developing and implementing the self-directed learning assessment tools among undergraduate medical students.
Article in Medical journal, Armed Forces India, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessing the landscape: A comprehensive exploration of health care professionals' readiness and perceptions toward implementing self-directed learning in Indian healthcare institutions.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The upcoming changes in digital technology have motivated health professionals to be lifelong learners and be updated with the recent trends. Self-directed learning (SDL) is one of the approaches for making undergraduate students health/ profession students lifelong learners. Moreover, the SDL approach allows learners to work in a team and gain social skills. The aim of the study was to develop and validate the facilitator and peer score sheet as an assessment tool for self-directed learning in the department of physiology, in the Indian context. Method: The facilitator and peer score sheet was developed and validated by the Delphi technique. The score sheet was implemented as a pilot test for one of the SDL modules in the department of physiology for undergraduate students. Result: Two Delphi rounds were conducted till the content validity index (CVI) for the Facilitator Score Sheet (FSS), for 10 items attained was 0.977 and a CVI of 0.90 for seven items was for the Peer Score Sheet (PSS). The Coefficient of Variance (CV) in FSS for items 6, 10, and 11 and in PSS for item 6 was more than 30, which is not acceptable, so the item needed to be modified or removed from the list. Conclusion: Varied assessment strategies are required for the SDL module to attain academic gain as per cognitive and affective attributional gains. Although novel, the present scale needs to be modified after incorporating all the recommendations from different stakeholders before reusing it for the students' SDL module.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.