ArticleMedical journal, Armed Forces India2024
Importance of interprofessional collaboration in teaching diabetic foot self-management: Perceptions of health care professionals.
Article in Medical journal, Armed Forces India, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to diabetic foot care among individuals with diabetes in India: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC public health · 2026Pooled it
- Impact of the Interprofessional Collaborative Education Program (IPCEP) on the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of diabetic foot care among individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a narrative review.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- Development and validation of an interprofessional collaborative educational module on the self-management of foot for individuals with type II diabetes mellitus in India.F1000Research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diabetes and associated diabetic foot ulcers require coordinated management, including several health care professional (HCPs). Therefore, an interprofessional (IP) team-based approach is essential for effectively managing and educating the population on diabetic foot self-management strategies. However, the perceptions of the HCPs related to the importance of IP teamwork in diabetic foot care and their readiness to work in an IP team are less explored. Methods: This qualitative study aimed to investigate the HCPs' perception on the importance of IP collaboration in diabetic foot care and their readiness to work as part of an IP team in teaching patients' effective diabetic foot self-management techniques. The study includes seven HCPs involved in diabetic foot management patient education and treatment. In-depth interviews using an interview guide and a thematic analysis of the interview transcripts were undertaken. Results: Every participant was strongly motivated to be an IP team member. The following themes were identified that supported IP team-based approach in diabetic foot care: 'patient-centric practices,' 'comprehensive care,' 'teamwork and coordination for improved patient outcome,' 'integrated approach,' 'professional knowledge amalgamation,' 'time-management,' 'education in a favorable environment,' 'constant motivation and support through educational modules,' and 'commitment and policy reforms.' Conclusions: The HCPs' were aware about the benefits of IP team-based approach in diabetic foot care. They further expressed their willingness to work as part of an IP team and suggested appropriate teaching methods for diabetic foot self-management. This manuscript thus attempts to create an awareness about the importance of IP approach in teaching the proper practices of diabetic foot care. The problems faced in implementing an IP approach in diabetic foot care and the possible solutions are also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.