ArticleMedical journal, Armed Forces India2024
Pre- and post-intervention oesophageal pressure topography metrics in the three subtypes of achalasia: A pilot study on Indian adults.
Article in Medical journal, Armed Forces India, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Achalasia is characterized by failure of relaxation of the lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) and abnormal peristalsis during swallowing. The study aimed to observe the effects of intervention in three sub-types of achalasia and compare the intervention outcomes among the three sub-types. Methods: Forty-one patients underwent Eckardt scoring for severity of achalasia, followed by high-resolution manometry (HRM). After three and six months of intervention (pneumatic dilatation or 'Heller's Cardiomyotomy), Eckardt scoring and HRM were repeated and compared with the initial results. Results: Out of the 41 patients, 13 were diagnosed with type I achalasia (31.71%), 18 with type II (43.90%), and 10 with type III (24.39%). Significant differences between the pre- and post-intervention values of median integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) and Eckardt score were found in all three sub-types. Although the beneficial effect of intervention lasted up to six months postintervention, it was less than three months postintervention values. The intervention success rates were highest for both laparoscopic Heller's myotomy (LHM) and pneumatic dilatation (PD) in Type II Achalasia at three and six months postintervention, respectively. Conclusion: One-time intervention is effective in all three sub-types. This benefit tends to taper over time but remains significant after six months of intervention. Type II Achalasia shows the best intervention outcomes compared to the other two sub-types at three months and six months post-intervention. Type III Achalasia shows the least response compared to other sub-types and is the poorest responder to intervention. The benefit of one-time intervention also deteriorates most in type III achalasia at the end of six months.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.