ArticleNeuro-oncology advances
Stalking the stalk: Isolated pituitary stalk thickening and predictive factors for proliferative disease.
Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pituitary stalk biopsy - A systematic review of the safety and efficacy of stalk lesion biopsy.Pituitary · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Few studies have evaluated predictive factors of isolated pituitary stalk thickening (iPST) in children. Methods: In this retrospective study, radiology, endocrinology, and neuro-oncology databases were interrogated to identify patients with iPST between January 2000 and June 2019. A blinded, longitudinal assessment of MRIs was performed using quantitative, semi-quantitative, and qualitative metrics. Neuroimaging parameters were correlated to clinical parameters. Results: Forty-seven patients were identified, with 40 meeting the inclusion criteria. Median age at baseline MRI was 9.6 years (range 0.9-17.5) with median follow-up of 5.2 years (range 0.3-18.6). Twenty-five (63%) were female. Thirty-four (85%) had pituitary dysfunction, including 31 with central diabetes insipidus (cDI). cDI was not predictive of proliferative disease (PfD): 69% of those with presumed primary hypophysitis (PPH) versus 93% with PfD ( Conclusions: In this cohort, 35% of children with iPST were diagnosed with PfD. The association of cDI and PfD was not statistically significant. Progressive thickening of the entire stalk was predictive of PfD and a "sack of marbles" pattern was found to be highly suggestive of germinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.