ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2024
Pathways for Identifying Problems in Nursing Quality on-Site Supervision: A Descriptive Qualitative Study.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: When the nursing department of our hospital checked the ward round records of the head nurse, it was found that some problems could not be found during rounds, and most of the problems found were superficial; Some studies have also found that most nursing managers are only going through the motions during rounds or are unable to identify problems due to a mismatch between their professional competence and the supervised department, or fail to identify superficial or deep-seated problems, making the quality of nursing supervision unsatisfactory. Purpose: To sort out the ideas and ways for nursing managers to identify problems in on-site supervision of nursing quality and to provide ideas and directions for being able to identify problems, identifying problems quickly, and identifying high-quality problems in the supervision. Methods: A descriptive qualitative study was used to conduct face-to-face semi-structured interviews with 14 nursing managers from Bethune Hospital in Shanxi, China. The current problems of nursing quality supervision were combined with the 5W1H analysis method to form an interview outline, and a total of 8 questions were set up to interview 14 nursing managers to understand how nursing managers identified problems in supervision. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data and extract themes. Results: Three views and six ways of problem identification were crystallized: three views were direct access, comparison discovery, and deep excavation; and six ways were listening, looking, asking, checking, visiting, and tracking. The "Pathways for identifying problems in nursing quality on-site supervision" was finally formed. Conclusion: The pathway for identifying problems in nursing quality supervision is scientific, reliable, and can be used as a guideline for identifying problems in nursing quality supervision. Implications for Nursing Practice: The connotation of nursing quality supervision can be improved through this pathway, and the development of nursing discipline can be promoted. Impact on Nursing Management: The "Pathways for identifying problems in nursing quality on-site supervision" is a clear pathway that helps nursing managers to quickly identify problems, especially during interdepartmental nursing quality inspections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.