ArticleChina CDC weekly2024
Post-Marketing Surveillance of Adverse Events Following Meningococcal Vaccination - China, 2013-2021.
Article in China CDC weekly, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
What is already known about this topic?: From 2010 to 2012, the incidence of adverse vaccine reactions from meningococcal vaccine (MenV) in China ranged from 8.46 to 56.30 per 100,000 doses. What is added by this report?: From 2013 to 2021, the overall reported rate of adverse events following immunization (AEFI) of five types of market-authorized MenV-containing vaccines in China was 37.87 per 100,000 doses administered, with a reported incidence of adverse vaccine reactions of 37.39 per 100,000 doses. The reported incidence of adverse vaccine reactions was comparable to that from 2010 to 2012 and perceived to be within an acceptable range. Most rare vaccine reactions were allergic rashes, and most of these cases were transient and non-serious. What are the implications for public health practice?: In China, the incidence of AEFI was very low, and serious abnormal reactions were extremely rare. We should continue to carry out technical training for vaccinators and on-site treatment capabilities to improve emergency treatment for anaphylactic shock and other serious events and ensure the continued safety of vaccination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.