Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39734778›Full record

ArticleACS ES&T water2024

Performance of Conditional Random Forest and Regression Models at Predicting Human Fecal Contamination of Produce Irrigation Ponds in the Southeastern United States.

Jessica Hofstetter, David A Holcomb, Amy M Kahler, Camila Rodrigues, Andre Luiz Biscaia Ribeiro da Silva, Mia C Mattioli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS ES&T water, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jessica HofstetterWaterborne Disease Prevention Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, United States; Chenega Enterprise Systems & Solutions, LLC, Chesapeake, Virginia 23320, United States; Department of Horticulture, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama 36849, United States.
David A HolcombWaterborne Disease Prevention Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4055-7164
Amy M KahlerWaterborne Disease Prevention Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, United States.
Camila RodriguesDepartment of Horticulture, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama 36849, United States.
Andre Luiz Biscaia Ribeiro da SilvaDepartment of Horticulture, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama 36849, United States.
Mia C MattioliWaterborne Disease Prevention Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7318-5240

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Irrigating fresh produce with contaminated water contributes to the burden of foodborne illness. Identifying fecal contamination of irrigation waters and characterizing fecal sources and associated environmental factors can help inform fresh produce safety and health hazard management. Using two previously collected data sets, we developed and evaluated the performance of logistic regression and conditional random forest models for predicting general and human-specific fecal contamination of ponds in southwest Georgia used for fresh produce irrigation. Generic

Indexed as

agricultural waterconditional random forestdead-end ultrafiltration (DEUF)foodborne illnessfresh produce safetymicrobial source trackingpredictive modelingquantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)

Identifiers

PMID39734778
PMCPMC11672865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.