ReviewPrecision chemistry2024
LASP to the Future of Atomic Simulation: Intelligence and Automation.
Review in Precision chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational protocol for modeling supported nanoparticle catalysts with strong metal-support interactions.STAR protocols · 2026Article
- Zwitterionic carbamate interfaces unlock efficient "liquid" COScience advances · 2026Article
- Reactive Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials for Chemistry and Materials Science.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- Challenges and Opportunities of Pretrained Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials in Heterogeneous Catalysis.ACS catalysis · 2026Review
- Node-equivariant message passing for efficient and accurate machine learning interatomic potentials.Chemical science · 2026Article
- Nanotube Derived Ordered Carbons Predicted by Neural Network Potential.Precision chemistry · 2025Article
- Data-driven discovery of Pt single atom embedded germanosilicate MFI zeolite catalysts for propane dehydrogenation.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Artificial-Intelligence Driven Precision Chemistry.Precision chemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atomic simulations aim to understand and predict complex physical phenomena, the success of which relies largely on the accuracy of the potential energy surface description and the efficiency to capture important rare events. LASP software (large-scale atomic simulation with a Neural Network Potential), released in 2018, incorporates the key ingredients to fulfill the ultimate goal of atomic simulations by combining advanced neural network potentials with efficient global optimization methods. This review introduces the recent development of the software along two main streams, namely, higher intelligence and more automation, to solve complex material and reaction problems. The latest version of LASP (LASP 3.7) features the global many-body function corrected neural network (G-MBNN) to improve the PES accuracy with low cost, which achieves a linear scaling efficiency for large-scale atomic simulations. The key functionalities of LASP are updated to incorporate (i) the ASOP and ML-interface methods for finding complex surface and interface structures under grand canonic conditions; (ii) the ML-TS and MMLPS methods to identify the lowest energy reaction pathway. With these powerful functionalities, LASP now serves as an intelligent data generator to create computational databases for end users. We exemplify the recent LASP database construction in zeolite and the metal-ligand properties for a new catalyst design.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.