Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39734761›Full record

ReviewPrecision chemistry2024

LASP to the Future of Atomic Simulation: Intelligence and Automation.

Xin-Tian Xie, Zheng-Xin Yang, Dongxiao Chen, Yun-Fei Shi, Pei-Lin Kang, Sicong Ma, Ye-Fei Li, Cheng Shang, Zhi-Pan Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Precision chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xin-Tian XieCollaborative Innovation Center of Chemistry for Energy Material, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Catalysis and Innovative Materials, Key Laboratory of Computational Physical Science, Department of Chemistry, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5166-2825
Zheng-Xin YangCollaborative Innovation Center of Chemistry for Energy Material, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Catalysis and Innovative Materials, Key Laboratory of Computational Physical Science, Department of Chemistry, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Dongxiao ChenCollaborative Innovation Center of Chemistry for Energy Material, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Catalysis and Innovative Materials, Key Laboratory of Computational Physical Science, Department of Chemistry, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Yun-Fei ShiCollaborative Innovation Center of Chemistry for Energy Material, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Catalysis and Innovative Materials, Key Laboratory of Computational Physical Science, Department of Chemistry, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Pei-Lin KangCollaborative Innovation Center of Chemistry for Energy Material, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Catalysis and Innovative Materials, Key Laboratory of Computational Physical Science, Department of Chemistry, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2147-2472
Sicong MaState Key Laboratory of Metal Organic Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200032, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5894-5910
Ye-Fei LiCollaborative Innovation Center of Chemistry for Energy Material, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Catalysis and Innovative Materials, Key Laboratory of Computational Physical Science, Department of Chemistry, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4433-7433
Cheng ShangCollaborative Innovation Center of Chemistry for Energy Material, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Catalysis and Innovative Materials, Key Laboratory of Computational Physical Science, Department of Chemistry, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7486-1514
Zhi-Pan LiuCollaborative Innovation Center of Chemistry for Energy Material, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Catalysis and Innovative Materials, Key Laboratory of Computational Physical Science, Department of Chemistry, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2906-5217

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atomic simulations aim to understand and predict complex physical phenomena, the success of which relies largely on the accuracy of the potential energy surface description and the efficiency to capture important rare events. LASP software (large-scale atomic simulation with a Neural Network Potential), released in 2018, incorporates the key ingredients to fulfill the ultimate goal of atomic simulations by combining advanced neural network potentials with efficient global optimization methods. This review introduces the recent development of the software along two main streams, namely, higher intelligence and more automation, to solve complex material and reaction problems. The latest version of LASP (LASP 3.7) features the global many-body function corrected neural network (G-MBNN) to improve the PES accuracy with low cost, which achieves a linear scaling efficiency for large-scale atomic simulations. The key functionalities of LASP are updated to incorporate (i) the ASOP and ML-interface methods for finding complex surface and interface structures under grand canonic conditions; (ii) the ML-TS and MMLPS methods to identify the lowest energy reaction pathway. With these powerful functionalities, LASP now serves as an intelligent data generator to create computational databases for end users. We exemplify the recent LASP database construction in zeolite and the metal-ligand properties for a new catalyst design.

Identifiers

PMID39734761
PMCPMC11672538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.