Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39734733›Full record

Article3D printing and additive manufacturing2024

Bone Ingrowth Simulation Within the Hexanoid, a Novel Scaffold Design.

Yuheng Wang, Luping Wang, Nicolas Soro, Pascal R Buenzli, Zhiyong Li, Nicholas Green, Kevin Tetsworth, Deniz Erbulut

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3D printing and additive manufacturing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yuheng WangOrthopedics Program, Herston Biofabrication Institute, Block 7 Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3212-007X
Luping WangFaculty of Engineering, Department of Mechanical, Medical and Process Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Nicolas SoroCentre for Advanced Material Processing and Manufacturing, Department of Mechanical and Mining Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Pascal R BuenzliFaculty of Science, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Zhiyong LiFaculty of Engineering, Department of Mechanical, Medical and Process Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Nicholas GreenOrthopedics Program, Herston Biofabrication Institute, Block 7 Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Kevin TetsworthOrthopedics Program, Herston Biofabrication Institute, Block 7 Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Deniz ErbulutOrthopedics Program, Herston Biofabrication Institute, Block 7 Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The utilization of bone scaffold implants represents a promising approach for repairing substantial bone defects. In recent years, various traditional scaffold structures have been developed and, with advances in materials biology and computer technology, novel scaffold designs are now being evaluated. This study investigated the effects of a novel scaffold unit cell design (Hexanoid) through a computational framework, comparing its performance to that of four well-known scaffold designs. A finite element analysis numerical simulation and mechanical testing were conducted to analyze the dynamic bone ingrowth process and the mechanical strength of the different scaffold designs. Bone formation within the Ti-6Al-4V metal scaffolds was simulated based on the theory of bone remodeling. The outcomes of the study reveal that the novel scaffold design (Hexanoid) attains a notably elevated ultimate bone volume fraction (∼27%), it outperformed conventional unit-cell designs found in extant literature, such as cubic design with 19.1% and circular design with 16.9% in relation to the bone-to-cavity volume ratio. This novel structure also has comparable mechanical strength to that of human compact bone tissue. While the design was not optimal in every category, it provided a very satisfactory overall performance regarding certain key aspects of bone performances in comparison with the five scaffold structures evaluated. Although limitations exist in this project, similar methodologies can also be applied in the primary evaluation of new scaffold structures, resulting in improved efficiency and effectiveness. In future research, the results of this project may be integrated with clinical rehabilitation processes to offer a critical evaluation for optimization of additional novel scaffold unit-cell structure designs.

Indexed as

bone ingrowth simulationbone scaffoldfinite element analysis (FEA)scaffold unit cell design

Identifiers

PMID39734733
PMCPMC11669832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.