Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39734728›Full record

Article3D printing and additive manufacturing2024

3D Bioprinting of Graphene Oxide-Incorporated Hydrogels for Neural Tissue Regeneration.

Jiahui Lai, Xiaodie Chen, Helen H Lu, Min Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3D printing and additive manufacturing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jiahui LaiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3749-5824
Xiaodie ChenDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Helen H LuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Min WangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6495-5637

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioprinting has emerged as a powerful manufacturing platform for tissue engineering, enabling the fabrication of 3D living structures by assembling living cells, biological molecules, and biomaterials into these structures. Among various biomaterials, hydrogels have been increasingly used in developing bioinks suitable for 3D bioprinting for diverse human body tissues and organs. In particular, hydrogel blends combining gelatin and gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA; "GG hydrogels") receive significant attention for 3D bioprinting owing to their many advantages, such as excellent biocompatibility, biodegradability, intrinsic bioactive groups, and polymer networks that combine the thermoresponsive gelation feature of gelatin and chemically crosslinkable attribute of GelMA. However, GG hydrogels have poor electroactive properties, which hinder their applications in neural tissue engineering where electrical conductivity is required. To overcome this problem, in this study, a small amount of highly electroactive graphene oxide (GO) was added in GG hydrogels to generate electroactive hydrogels for 3D bioprinting in neural tissue engineering. The incorporation of GO nanoparticles slightly improved mechanical properties and significantly increased electrical conductivity of GG hydrogels. All GO/GG composite hydrogels exhibited shear thinning behavior and sufficient viscosity and hence could be 3D printed into 3D porous scaffolds with good shape fidelity. Furthermore, bioinks combining rat bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (rBMSCs) with GO/GG composite hydrogels could be 3D bioprinted into GO/GG constructs with high cell viability. GO nanoparticles in the constructs provided ultraviolet (UV) shading effect and facilitated cell survival during UV exposure after bioprinting. The GO/GG composite hydrogels appear promising for 3D bioprinting applications in repairing damaged neural tissues.

Indexed as

3D bioprintinggraphene oxidehydrogel scaffoldmesenchymal stem cellneural tissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID39734728
PMCPMC11669833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.