ArticleTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2024
Predictive factors for complete pathologic response in luminal breast cancer: impact of ki67 and HER2 low expression.
Article in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proteomic Biomarker Discovery in Breast Cancer: Advances, Challenges, and Translational Prospects.Journal of biochemical and molecular toxicology · 2026Review
- Role of Endogenous Myoglobin in Anthracycline Response in Breast Cancer.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- A Giant Invasive Cribriform Carcinoma Presenting as a Breast Abscess: A Case of Massive Cystic Degeneration.International medical case reports journal · 2026Article
- Comparison of Clinicopathological Characteristics for HER2-Null, HER2-Ultralow and HER2-Low Breast Cancer: A Single-Center Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic biomarker in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer undergoing taxane-carboplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Complete pathological response to neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) in breast cancer is associated with prolonged survival. Compared to other breast cancer immunophenotypes, luminal tumors are the least chemosensitive with low rates of pathological response within this molecular subtype. Thus, finding predictors of response in this subset remains challenging. The emerging concept of low human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression has led to a repurpose of the current prognostic system. Little is known about its correlation with response to NAT. Objectives: This study aims to evaluate predictors of response in early-stage luminal breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Design: A total of 252 luminal patients who received NAT were retrospectively assessed in this cohort study. Methods: We analyzed the correlation of ki67 and HER2 low expression with the rate of pathologic response. Using ki67 as a continuous variable and applying the receiver operating characteristic curves method. Results: We identified that in patients with a ki67 expression level >37%, the probability of having a complete pathological response was 4.80 times higher (odds ratio = 4.80, 95% confidence interval: 1.92-12.04). In Her2-low breast cancer patients, Her2 expression did not correlate with a better response rate. Conclusion: In our study, a ki67 expression value greater than 37% constitutes a predictive biomarker of pathological complete response in the subgroup of patients with luminal B tumors and could be considered, therefore, an indicator for treatment decisions in this subgroup.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.