Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39734701›Full record

ReviewBiomaterials translational2024

The use of hydrogel microspheres as cell and drug delivery carriers for bone, cartilage, and soft tissue regeneration.

Chung-Hsun Lin, Jesse R Srioudom, Wei Sun, Malcolm Xing, Su Yan, Le Yu, Jian Yang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomaterials translational, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chung-Hsun LinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Jesse R SrioudomDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Wei SunLeicester International Institute, Dalian University of Technology, Panjin, Liaoning Province, China.
Malcolm XingDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Su YanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Le YuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Jian YangBiomedical Engineering Program, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.

Funding

Photoacoustic and epigenetic nerve scaffold for nerve regenerationR01NS123433 · NINDS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI Su Yan · 2022 to 2026
$2.1M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS123433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone, cartilage, and soft tissue regeneration is a complex process involving many cellular activities across various cell types. Autografts remain the "gold standard" for the regeneration of these tissues. However, the use of autografts is associated with many disadvantages, including donor scarcity, the requirement of multiple surgeries, and the risk of infection. The development of tissue engineering techniques opens new avenues for enhanced tissue regeneration. Nowadays, the expectations of tissue engineering scaffolds have gone beyond merely providing physical support for cell attachment. Ideal scaffolds should also provide biological cues to actively boost tissue regeneration. As a new type of injectable biomaterial, hydrogel microspheres have been increasingly recognised as promising therapeutic carriers for the local delivery of cells and drugs to enhance tissue regeneration. Compared to traditional tissue engineering scaffolds and bulk hydrogel, hydrogel microspheres possess distinct advantages, including less invasive delivery, larger surface area, higher transparency for visualisation, and greater flexibility for functionalisation. Herein, we review the materials characteristics of hydrogel microspheres and compare their fabrication approaches, including microfluidics, batch emulsion, electrohydrodynamic spraying, lithography, and mechanical fragmentation. Additionally, based on the different requirements for bone, cartilage, nerve, skin, and muscle tissue regeneration, we summarize the applications of hydrogel microspheres as cell and drug delivery carriers for the regeneration of these tissues. Overall, hydrogel microspheres are regarded as effective therapeutic delivery carriers to enhance tissue regeneration in regenerative medicine. However, significant effort is required before hydrogel microspheres become widely accepted as commercial products for clinical use.

Indexed as

drug deliveryfabrication techniqueshydrogel microspheresmicrogelstissue regeneration

Identifiers

PMID39734701
PMCPMC11681182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.