Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39734699›Full record

ReviewBiomaterials translational2024

From the microspheres to scaffolds: advances in polymer microsphere scaffolds for bone regeneration applications.

Shuhao Yang, Haoming Wu, Chao Peng, Jian He, Zhengguang Pu, Zhidong Lin, Jun Wang, Yingkun Hu, Qiao Su, Bingnan Zhou and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomaterials translational, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Shuhao YangDepartment of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Haoming WuSchool of Preclinical Medicine of Chengdu University, Chengdu University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Chao PengClinical Medical College and Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, Chengdu University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Jian HeCollege of Basic Medicine and Forensic Medicine, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, Henan Province, China.
Zhengguang PuClinical Medical College and Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, Chengdu University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Zhidong LinThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Jun WangDepartment of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yingkun HuDepartment of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Qiao SuWest China School of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Bingnan ZhouSchool of Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Xin YongKey Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Department of Paediatrics, West China Second University Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Hai LanClinical Medical College and Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, Chengdu University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Ning HuDepartment of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Xulin HuClinical Medical College and Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, Chengdu University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment and repair of bone tissue damage and loss due to infection, tumours, and trauma are major challenges in clinical practice. Artificial bone scaffolds offer a safer, simpler, and more feasible alternative to bone transplantation, serving to fill bone defects and promote bone tissue regeneration. Ideally, these scaffolds should possess osteoconductive, osteoinductive, and osseointegrative properties. However, the current first-generation implants, represented by titanium alloys, have shown poor bone-implant integration performance and cannot meet the requirements for bone tissue repair. This has led to increased research on second and third generation artificial bone scaffolds, which focus on loading bioactive molecules and cells. Polymer microspheres, known for their high specific surface areas at the micro- and nanoscale, exhibit excellent cell and drug delivery behaviours. Additionally, with their unique rigid structure, microsphere scaffolds can be constructed using methods such as thermal sintering, injection, and microsphere encapsulation. These scaffolds not only ensure the excellent cell drug loading performance of microspheres but also exhibit spatial modulation behaviour, aiding in bone repair within a three-dimensional network structure. This article provides a summary and discussion of the use of polymer microsphere scaffolds for bone repair, focusing on the mechanisms of bone tissue repair and the current status of clinical bone grafts, aimed at advancing research in bone repair.

Indexed as

biomimetic scaffoldsbone tissue engineeringpolymer microspheresregenerative medicine

Identifiers

PMID39734699
PMCPMC11681185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.