Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39734698›Full record

ReviewBiomaterials translational2024

Hydrogel microspheres for bone regeneration through regulation of the regenerative microenvironment.

Pengrui Zhang, Qiwei Qin, Xinna Cao, Honglin Xiang, Dechao Feng, Dilinaer Wusiman, Yuling Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomaterials translational, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pengrui ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Laboratory of Biological Tissue Engineering and Digital Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan Province, China.
Qiwei QinDepartment of Orthopaedics, Laboratory of Biological Tissue Engineering and Digital Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan Province, China.
Xinna CaoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Laboratory of Biological Tissue Engineering and Digital Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan Province, China.
Honglin XiangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Laboratory of Biological Tissue Engineering and Digital Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan Province, China.
Dechao FengDivision of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Dilinaer WusimanDepartment of Comparative Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Yuling LiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Laboratory of Biological Tissue Engineering and Digital Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone defects are a prevalent category of skeletal tissue disorders in clinical practice, with a range of pathogenic factors and frequently suboptimal clinical treatment effects. In bone regeneration of bone defects, the bone regeneration microenvironment-composed of physiological, chemical, and physical components-is the core element that dynamically coordinates to promote bone regeneration. In recent years, medical biomaterials with bioactivity and functional tunability have been widely researched upon and applied in the fields of tissue replacement/regeneration, and remodelling of organ structure and function. The biomaterial treatment system based on the comprehensive regulation strategy of bone regeneration microenvironment is expected to solve the clinical problem of bone defect. Hydrogel microspheres (HMS) possess a highly specific surface area and porosity, an easily adjustable physical structure, and high encapsulation efficiency for drugs and stem cells. They can serve as highly efficient carriers for bioactive factors, gene agents, and stem cells, showing potential advantages in the comprehensive regulation of bone regeneration microenvironment to enhance bone regeneration. This review aims to clarify the components of the bone regeneration microenvironment, the application of HMS in bone regeneration, and the associated mechanisms. It also discusses various preparation materials and methods of HMS and their applications in bone tissue engineering. Furthermore, it elaborates on the relevant mechanisms by which HMS regulates the physiological, chemical, and physical microenvironment in bone regeneration to achieve bone regeneration. Finally, we discuss the future prospects of the HMS system application for comprehensive regulation of bone regeneration microenvironment, to provide novel perspectives for the research and application of HMS in the bone tissue engineering field.

Indexed as

bone regenerationbone tissue engineeringhydrogel microspheresregeneration microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID39734698
PMCPMC11681181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.