Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39734689›Full record

ArticleOxford medical case reports2024

Severe restenosis after stentless treatment with coronary intravascular lithotripsy for calcified nodule lesions: a serial observation with IVUS.

Rina Konishi, Akinori Higaki, Toru Miyoshi, Kazuhisa Nishimura, Shuntaro Ikeda, Osamu Yamaguchi

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Oxford medical case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rina KonishiDepartment of Cardiology, Pulmonology, Hypertension & Nephrolgy, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, Japan.
Akinori HigakiDepartment of Cardiology, Pulmonology, Hypertension & Nephrolgy, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0827-874X
Toru MiyoshiDepartment of Cardiology, Pulmonology, Hypertension & Nephrolgy, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, Japan.
Kazuhisa NishimuraDepartment of Cardiology, Pulmonology, Hypertension & Nephrolgy, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, Japan.
Shuntaro IkedaDepartment of Cardiology, Pulmonology, Hypertension & Nephrolgy, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, Japan.
Osamu YamaguchiDepartment of Cardiology, Pulmonology, Hypertension & Nephrolgy, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An 82-year-old woman with a history of myocardial infarction presented with worsening effort angina. Coronary angiography (CAG) revealed 75% stenosis in the proximal left anterior descending artery (LAD), with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) identifying a severe calcified nodule near a previously implanted drug-eluting stent. The lesion was treated with intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) and a drug-coated balloon (DCB), avoiding left main crossover stenting. Despite initial success, the patient experienced restenosis three months later, managed conservatively based on favorable DFR/FFR values. However, worsening symptoms led to repeat CAG, revealing 99% restenosis with calcified nodule. A second IVL was performed, followed by crossover stenting from the left main to the LAD, achieving successful stent expansion. This case underscores the potential for severe restenosis following IVL and DCB angioplasty, highlighting the limitations of IVL in reducing calcified plaque volume and the importance of close follow-up.

Indexed as

coronary artery diseaseintravascular lithotripsyStentless PCI

Identifiers

PMID39734689
PMCPMC11682484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.