ArticleJournal of geriatric cardiology : JGC2024
Composite outcomes of drug-coated balloon using in left main bifurcation lesions: a systematic review.
Article in Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical application and expansion of paclitaxel-coated balloons in coronary atherosclerotic disease.World journal of cardiology · 2026Review
- Case Report: Trissing balloon inflation and percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-coated balloons for the treatment of restenosis of a left main trifurcation lesion.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Left main coronary bifurcation lesions account for 50% of left main coronary artery disease cases. Although a drug-coated balloon (DCB) has the advantages of immediate release of the drug to the arterial wall and no remaining struts, there is no conclusive evidence to support DCB use. Methods & Results: We conducted a systematic review in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Eighteen retrospective studies and two prospective studies in which left main bifurcation lesions were treated with DCBs were included in our qualitative analysis. The studies were divided into two groups according to the type of DCB used: DCB only and DCB + stent. At the midterm follow-up, the use of DCBs had noninferior or even superior angiographic and clinical outcomes in treating left main bifurcation lesions compared with the use of drug-eluting stents or conventional balloons, whether for de novo or in-stent restenosis lesions. Additionally, side branch late lumen enlargement was observed in several of the included studies, which indicates that DCBs may have the advantage of side branch protection. Conclusions: According to our descriptive analysis, the DCB technique has a favorable safety and efficacy profiles for the treatment of left main bifurcation lesions. However, additional studies, especially randomized controlled trials, are needed to establish standards for the DCB technique.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.