Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39734644›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient experience2024

Talking Cancer-Cancer Talking: A Linguistic and Thematic Analysis of Patient Narratives.

Ad A Kaptein, Pim B van der Meer, Fleur L Fisher, Hanneke W M van Laarhoven, James W Pennebaker, Ad J J M Vingerhoets

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient experience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ad A KapteinDepartment of Medical Psychology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1333-7679
Pim B van der MeerDepartment of Psychiatry, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Fleur L FisherDepartment of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Hanneke W M van LaarhovenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
James W PennebakerDepartment of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Ad J J M VingerhoetsDepartment of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To explore "the lived experience" of patients with cancer through narratives, in-depth interviews with 20 patients were conducted in the patients' homes-"at the kitchen table." Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed following the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) methodology. Thematic Analysis was used to explore themes in the narratives. Scores on relevant LIWC dimensions of the 20 patients were compared with norm data for respondents without cancer. Patients with cancer scored higher on "anger" and "sadness" (psychologic processes dimension); lower on "insight," "causes," and "tentatives" (cognitive processes dimension); and lower on "religion." Major themes identified from the Thematic Analysis were resilience, fatigue, social relationships, turning inward psychologically, shared decision-making, and psychological support. Narratives of patients with cancer are a source of rich data on how persons with cancer make sense of their illness, its medical management, and its psychological and social consequences. Qualitative methods of data analysis (LIWC; Thematic Analysis) are a highly valuable element in the methodology of exploring patient experience.

Indexed as

cancerhealth humanitiesillness perceptionsLIWC (Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count)patient narrativesthematic analysis

Identifiers

PMID39734644
PMCPMC11672471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.