ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024
Clinical presentations, electrophysiologic features, and long-term follow-up in Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome: a series of six patients.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS) is an autoimmune disorder of the presynaptic neuromuscular junction associated with antibody mediated dysfunction of voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs). LEMS can exist as a paraneoplastic syndrome, paraneoplastic-LEMS (P-LEMS), when associated with tumors, most commonly, small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) or as a non-paraneoplastic condition (NP-LEMS) when no malignancies are detected. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted in 3 tertiary hospitals in Saudi Arabia for patients diagnosed with LEMS between January 2010 and January 2020. Patients meeting all the following criteria were included: (1) weakness or fatigability of one or more extremity or oculo-bulbar muscles, (2) 60% or higher increment of compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitudes immediately following isometric exercise, and (3) positive serum P/Q type VGCC antibodies. Clinical, laboratory, and electrophysiologic features, as well as radiologic imaging modalities performed for tumor screening were reviewed. Results: The study included six patients diagnosed with LEMS, split evenly between P-LEMS and NP-LEMS. Fatigability, particularly in the lower extremities, and dyspnea on exertion were commonly reported symptoms. Low CMAP amplitudes were more frequently seen in NP-LEMS as compared to P-LEMS when recorded from both abductor pollicis brevis and abductor digiti minimi muscles. An incremental response above 60% in post activation CMAPs was detected at similar rates following variable durations of isometric exercise (10, 15, and 20 s). Tumor types detected in 3 patients with P-LEMS are SCLC, breast carcinoma, colon adenocarcinoma, and prostate acinar adenocarcinoma. Triple malignancy was detected in one patient. Conclusion: This is the first study to describe clinical and electrophysiologic features of LEMS in an Arab ethnic cohort. Early recognition of LEMS has a significant impact on prognosis, especially given the aggressive nature of associated cancers such as SCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.