Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39734609›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2024

Impact of retraining and data partitions on the generalizability of a deep learning model in the task of COVID-19 classification on chest radiographs.

Mena Shenouda, Heather M Whitney, Maryellen L Giger, Samuel G Armato

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mena ShenoudaThe University of Chicago, Committee on Medical Physics, Department of Radiology, Chicago, Illinois, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3286-1350
Heather M WhitneyThe University of Chicago, Committee on Medical Physics, Department of Radiology, Chicago, Illinois, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7258-1102
Maryellen L GigerThe University of Chicago, Committee on Medical Physics, Department of Radiology, Chicago, Illinois, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5482-9728
Samuel G ArmatoThe University of Chicago, Committee on Medical Physics, Department of Radiology, Chicago, Illinois, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5428-7997

Funding

RADX TECH - CERES NANOSCIENCE INC NANOTRAP PARTICLE MANUFACTURING75N92020C00021 · NHLBI · CERES NANOSCIENCES, LLLP · PI DUNLAP, ROSS · 2021 to 2021
$4.0M
Protected Radiomics Analysis Commons for Deep Learning in Biomedical DiscoveryS10OD025081 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI GIGER, MARYELLEN L. · 2018 to 2018
$339k
NHLBI NIH HHS 75N92020C00008NHLBI NIH HHS 75N92020C00021NIH HHS S10 OD025081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the impact of different model retraining schemes and data partitioning on model performance in the task of COVID-19 classification on standard chest radiographs (CXRs), in the context of model generalizability. Approach: Two datasets from the same institution were used: Set A (9860 patients, collected from 02/20/2020 to 02/03/2021) and Set B (5893 patients, collected from 03/15/2020 to 01/01/2022). An original deep learning (DL) model trained and tested in the task of COVID-19 classification using the initial partition of Set A achieved an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.76, whereas Set B yielded a significantly lower value of 0.67. To explore this discrepancy, four separate strategies were undertaken on the original model: (1) retrain using Set B, (2) fine-tune using Set B, (3) Results: The model achieved the following AUC values (95% confidence interval) for the four methods: (1) 0.61 [0.56, 0.66]; (2) 0.70 [0.66, 0.73], both on Set B; (3) 0.76 [0.72, 0.79] on the initial test partition of Set A and 0.68 [0.66, 0.70] on Set B; and (4) Conclusions: Different data repartitions of the same dataset used to train a DL model demonstrated significantly different performance values that helped explain the discrepancy between Set A and Set B and further demonstrated the limitations of model generalizability.

Indexed as

chest radiographyCOVID-19data partitioningdeep learningmodel generalizability

Identifiers

PMID39734609
PMCPMC11670362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.