ReviewJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2024
Applications of mixed reality with medical imaging for training and clinical practice.
Review in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Use of extended reality head-mounted displays in US health care education: a scoping review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- VR-prep improves visualization of medical data in augmented reality on smartphones.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Fusion of Robotics and Imaging: A Vision of the Future.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This review summarizes the current use of extended reality (XR) including virtual reality (VR), mixed reality, and augmented reality (AR) in the medical field, ranging from medical imaging to training to preoperative planning. It covers the integration of these technologies into clinical practice and within medical training while discussing the challenges and future opportunities in this sphere. This will hopefully encourage more physicians to collaborate on integrating medicine and technology. Approach: The review was written by experts in the field based on their knowledge and on recent publications exploring the topic of extended realities in medicine. Results: Based on our findings, XR including VR, mixed reality, and AR are increasingly utilized within surgery both for preoperative planning and intraoperative procedures. These technologies are also promising means for improved education at every level of physician training. However, there are still barriers to the widespread adoption of VR, mixed reality, and AR, including human factors, technological challenges, and regulatory issues. Conclusions: Based on the current use of VR, mixed reality, and AR, it is likely that the use of these technologies will continue to grow over the next decade. To support the development and integration of XR into medicine, it is important for academic groups to collaborate with industrial groups and regulatory agencies in these endeavors. These joint projects will help address the current limitations and mutually benefit both fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.