Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39734597›Full record

ArticleBJR open2025

Definition of a disability weight for human exposure to ionizing radiation and its application to the justification of medical exposure.

Colin John Kotre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJR open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Colin John KotreInstitute of Health, University of Cumbria, Bowerham Road, Lancaster, LA1 3JD, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1890-1160

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To establish a link between radiation dosimetry and disability-adjusted life-years (DALY) with the aim of quantifying the justification of medical exposures. Methods: The health detriment, defined as lifetime loss of DALY at age of exposure to ionizing radiation for a US-European population was calculated. A simple model of the relationship was fitted to the results. Apart from in late life within the latency period for radiation-induced cancers, most of the relationship can be adequately fitted to a straight line of negative gradient. The gradient of this line corresponds to a loss of DALY per year following exposure to radiation and is therefore equivalent to a disability weight (DW) used in the calculation of DALY. Results: Radiation dose-dependent DWs for radiation exposure to a US-European population are estimated as 0.020 DALY/yr/Sv for males and 0.022 DALY/yr/Sv for females. Conclusions: By comparing a range of 66 radiological examinations in terms of the DWs of the disease or injury states with the DWs resulting from the associated radiological exposures, it is demonstrated graphically that the resulting benefit is far greater than the detriment in every case. Advances in knowledge: The definition of a DW for ionizing radiation, proportional to effective dose as currently defined, can link radiation exposure to the existing large body of data on the DALY burden and DWs for a wide range of diseases and injuries, providing a means for the quantitative justification of the benefit-detriment balance of medical exposures.

Indexed as

DALYdetrimentjustificationradiationradiology

Identifiers

PMID39734597
PMCPMC11676793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.