ArticleResearch and reports in urology2024
Knowledge of Male Infertility and Acceptance of Medical Assistance Reproductive Technology Among Fertile and Infertile Senegalese Men.
Article in Research and reports in urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of adult men's knowledge in the area of male fertility in relation to selected lifestyle factors.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Investigating Socioeconomic Disparities in Access to and Utilization of Assisted Reproductive Technology Among Infertile Couples in Pakistan: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Epidemiology and occupational risk factors of male infertility based on 3,025 patients in Eastern Morocco during 2021-2023: a cohort study.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The objective of our study was to examine the knowledge of male infertility and the acceptance of assisted reproductive technology (ART) methods. Patients and Methods: We conducted a descriptive, comparative, cross-sectional study from April 2023 to August 2023 in a center in Dakar. Included in the study were male patients aged 18 and older followed for male infertility (group 1) and fertile patients of the same age as those in group 1 (group 2). We designed a questionnaire assessing the sociodemographic characteristics of the respondents, their knowledge of male infertility, knowledge of ART, its acceptability, and the source of information about male infertility. Results: Our sample size consisted of 119 respondents for each group. The average age of respondents in both groups was 41.24 ± 8.42 years. Fifty-eight percent of respondents in group 1 were referred by their wife's gynecologist. Fifty-four percent of respondents in group 1 had a good knowledge of male infertility, and 42.86% had average knowledge of male infertility. The majority of respondents in group 1 (42.9%) and group 2 (40.3%) did not know the duration that defines infertility. Fifty-seven percent of respondents in Group 1 and 81.5% of respondents in Group 2 did not know what assisted reproductive technology meant. Eighty-six percent of respondents in Group 1 agreed to use ART for procreation. The majority of respondents in Group 1 (54.6%) and Group 2 (58.8%) attributed a success rate of between 35% and 75% to ART. Conclusion: Infertile men had better knowledge of male fertility than fertile men. Respondents in both groups, as well as the advanced age of men did not know the duration defining infertility. Poor knowledge of ART was also observed among respondents in both groups, and a better acceptance of ART methods was noted among infertile men.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.