ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2025
Telehealth use in the well-child health setting. A systematic review of acceptability and effectiveness for families and practitioners.
Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A conceptual framework and umbrella review of digital health technology interventions and health equity.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- Who Benefits More in Group-Based and Individual Telehealth Parenting Programs: Moderators and Distal Child Outcomes among Military Families.Research on child and adolescent psychopathology · 2026Trial
- A Scoping Review of Implemented Innovations in Cancer Care: Implications for Pan-Canadian Scaling.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Digital Competencies for Pediatric Nurse Leaders to Sustain Patient- and Family-Centered Care: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Neurodevelopmental Diagnoses Before, During, and After the COVID-19 Pandemic.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Telehealth Approaches for Pediatric Otitis Media and Clinical Outcomes: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Parental Self-Efficacy in Managing Pediatrics' Medications and Treatments in Jordan: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Enhancing Pediatric Outpatient Medical Services Through the Implementation of the Smart Well Child Center Application.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Telenursing use in mother and child community health centers: A qualitative study among public health nurses.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Universal well-child health nursing services in high-resource countries promote the health and well-being of children and families while preventing health inequities. The COVID-19 pandemic and technological advancements have led to the increased use of telehealth in this field. To enhance policies and practices, it's important to understand the acceptability and effectiveness of telehealth, as well as the barriers and enablers to its implementation, and to determine when its use is appropriate and safe. Objective: To explore the global evidence on the use of telehealth in well-child health settings within high-income countries. Focussing on the effectiveness and acceptability of telehealth, along with the factors affecting its implementation and the considerations for safety from the perspectives of both providers and families. Design: A mixed methods systematic review. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. The inclusion criteria for the review included: primary research papers written in English, conducted in high-income countries, focused on telehealth in the well-child health setting, and involving children under six years of age. The search, which was completed in July 2023, systematically explored the CINAHL, ProQuest Central, PubMed, and Web of Science bibliographic databases. Studies were critically appraised for quality, and relevant data extracted. A convergent segregated approach was employed to synthesise both quantitative and qualitative data, which is presented in a narrative format. Results: A total of 4,354 records were identified and screened, and 169 full-text papers were assessed for eligibility, resulting in 20 papers for inclusion. Telehealth acceptability among families was reported in 13 of the 20 studies reviewed, with participants expressing high satisfaction regarding its use as a complement to standard care. Only three studies examined practitioners' acceptance, revealing mixed responses. Effectiveness was observed in 15 studies, with no significant differences found between the control and telehealth groups, suggesting that telehealth may achieve outcomes like those of standard care. Four studies identified both enablers and barriers to the implementation of telehealth, though none addressed concerns regarding safety and appropriateness. Conclusions: Telehealth shows promise for well-child health services, but there is limited evidence of its effectiveness and safety. The COVID-19 pandemic increased its use, yet risks need further exploration. To validate telehealth in this field, we must identify effective applications, tackle implementation barriers, and ensure client safety. Additional research is essential for developing evidence-based policies for future practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.