Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39734484›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of stem cells2024

Dual role of extracellular vesicles in neurodegenerative diseases.

Arianna Scuteri, Elisabetta Donzelli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of stem cells, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arianna ScuteriExperimental Neurology Unit and Milan Center for Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza 20900, Italy. arianna.scuteri@unimib.it.
Elisabetta DonzelliExperimental Neurology Unit and Milan Center for Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza 20900, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are cell-to-cell interaction tools that are attracting increasing interest in the literature in two opposing areas. In addition to their role in physiological development, there is growing evidence of their involvement in healing and protective processes. However, EVs also mediate pathological conditions, particularly contributing to the progression of several chronic diseases, such as neurodegenerative diseases. On the other hand, EVs also form the core of a new therapeutic strategy for neuroprotection, which is based on the administration of EVs derived from a wide range of donor cells. In particular, the possibility of obtaining numerous EVs from stem cells of different origins, which is feasible for therapeutic aims, is now under investigation. In this review, we focused on neurodegenerative diseases, in which EVs could have a propagative detrimental effect or could also be exploited to deliver protective factors. This review explores the different hypotheses concerning the dual role of EVs, with the aim of shedding light on the following question: Can vesicles be used to fight vesicle-propagated diseases?

Indexed as

BiomarkersCellular communicationExtracellular vesiclesInduced pluripotent stem cellsMesenchymal stem cellsNeurodegenerative diseasesNeuroprotection

Identifiers

PMID39734484
PMCPMC11669982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.