ArticleJournal of asthma and allergy2024
Early and Sustained Response to Benralizumab in Severe, Eosinophilic Asthma: A Real-World Observational Study.
Article in Journal of asthma and allergy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Remission in Patients with Severe Eosinophilic Asthma - A Single-Arm Observational Study with Benralizumab.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2026Article
- Benralizumab-Induced Asthma Remission: Impact of Different Tools and Thresholds to Define Good Asthma Control.Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases · 2026Article
- Hypereosinophilic Syndrome in a Patient With Complex Pulmonary Hypertension and Sjogren's Syndrome: A Case Report.Cureus · 2025Article
- Regulation of eosinophil recruitment and heterogeneity during allergic airway inflammation.Frontiers in allergy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Although studies have evaluated benralizumab, a monoclonal IL-5 receptor α antibody in severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA), in real-world settings, additional evidence is needed to further characterize its effectiveness in specific patient populations. Our study aimed to evaluate asthma control over 56 weeks in patients treated with benralizumab in Swiss real-world settings. Patients and Methods: Conducted across 13 centres, this prospective, observational, non-interventional study involved 73 adults with physician confirmed SEA. Benralizumab 30 mg was administered according to the Swiss label at baseline and up to week 56. Primary outcome was the change in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-5) scores at week 8 compared to baseline. Exacerbations, use of oral corticosteroids (OCS), and lung function were assessed descriptively. Results: At baseline, the mean ACQ-5 score was 2.76 (SD 1.26), with 82.2% of patients showing not well-controlled asthma (ACQ-5 > 1.5). At week 8, the mean change in ACQ-5 compared to baseline was -0.95 (95% CI: -1.25, -0.66; p < 0.001). More than half of patients (59.1%) reached a clinically relevant improvement (MCID ≥ 0.5) at week 8, with 40.9% of patients doing so at week 1 and 87.2% at week 56. The annualized exacerbation rate (AER) of 3.65 (95% CI: 3.18, 4.18) at baseline was reduced to 0.68 (95% CI: 0.39, 1.19) at week 56. The relative reduction in AER from baseline to week 56 was 81.3%. Maintenance usage of OCS at baseline (median 25.0 mg/day) decreased over the study leading to a median change of 17.50 mg/day (95% CI: 10.0; 40.0) from baseline compared to week 56. The mean pre-bronchodilator FEV1 change from baseline to week 56 was 0.23 L (95% CI: 0.08; 0.38, p = 0.003). Conclusion: Benralizumab demonstrated significant, rapid improvements in asthma control within one week of treatment initiation, with sustained benefits over 56 weeks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.