ArticleHeliyon2024
Computer vision-based instantaneous speed tracking system for measuring the subtask speed in the 100-meter sprinter: Development and concurrent validity study.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of concurrent training on speed and agility performance in soccer referees.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Use of Technologies for the Acquisition and Processing Strategies for Motion Data Analysis.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The 100-m sprint is one of the track events, and the pace of the runner can be measured using a variety of tools, such as a hand stopwatch, timing gate, laser device, radar device, photocell timing, etc. The data measured is the mean travel time. Nonetheless, monitoring an individual sprinter's instantaneous speed tracking is essential for assisting staff trainers in developing an appropriate training schedule for the individual sprinter. The purpose of this study was to construct a computer vision-based system for assessing the sprinting speed of the 100-m subtasks and also to investigate the concurrent validity of video analysis software among athletes. Five athletes participated in the research to determine its validity. Over the course of two trials, the sprinting pace of each participant's subtasks (a 100-m split to 10 m for each subtask) was measured. The application of the computer vision-based system to video analysis software was validated using the Pearson correlation coefficient. The agreement between the two measurement systems was quantified using Bland-Altman plots. The results revealed a significant relationship between the two systems and all 100-m subtask sprinting speeds (r = 0.961-1.000, p 0.0001). The Bland-Altman analyses indicated that the mean differences in 100-m subtask speeds were consistently close to zero, falling within the 95 % limits of agreement. The scatter plot distribution showed symmetry. The computer vision-based system proved to be a valid tool, suggesting its potential value in measuring and monitoring the 100-m subtask sprinting speed of athletes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.