Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39734462›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2024

Prognostic value of combined systemic inflammation response index and prognostic nutritional index in colorectal cancer patients.

Ke-Jin Li, Zi-Yi Zhang, Subinur Sulayman, Yin Shu, Kuan Wang, Saibihutula Ababaike, Xiang-Yue Zeng, Ze-Liang Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ke-Jin LiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830000, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China.
Zi-Yi ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830000, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China.
Subinur SulaymanDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830000, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China.
Yin ShuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830000, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China.
Kuan WangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830000, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China.
Saibihutula AbabaikeDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830000, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China.
Xiang-Yue ZengDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830000, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China.
Ze-Liang ZhaoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830000, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China. zlzhao71@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients is notably influenced by both inflammation and nutritional status. The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) have been reported in prognostic studies of various tumors. However, the efficacy of the combination of the two in predicting the prognosis of CRC patients has not been studied.

aimTo evaluate the effectiveness of PNI and SIRI in predicting the prognosis of patients with CRC.

methodsWe retrospectively gathered data from 470 CRC patients who underwent feasible radical surgery at Xinjiang Cancer Hospital. The optimal cut-off values for SIRI and PNI, along with their predictive power for survival, were determined through area under the receiver operating characteristic curve using time-dependent receiver operating characteristic analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were applied to assess prognostic impact, and a multifactorial Cox proportional hazards model was employed for analysis. Additionally, a new model, PSIRI, was developed and assessed for its survival prediction capability.

resultsThe optimal cutoff values for PNI and SIRI were determined to be 47.80 and 1.38, respectively. Based on these values, patients were categorized into high PNI and low PNI groups, as well as high SIRI and low SIRI groups. Significant differences in age, T stage, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) subgroups were observed between the PNI groups in the baseline profile. In the SIRI group, notable differences were found in gender, T stage, nerve invasion, intravascular tumor emboli, NLR, MLR, and PLR subgroups. Both low PNI and high SIRI were identified as independent risk factors for poor prognosis in CRC patients. When combined into the PSIRI model, it was shown that patients with a PSIRI ≤ 1 had a higher risk of death compared to those with a PSIRI of 2.

conclusionWe assessed the impact of PNI and SIRI on the prognostic survival of CRC patients and developed a new model, PSIRI. This model demonstrated superior predictive accuracy, with a concordance index of 0.767.

Indexed as

Colorectal cancerPrognosisPrognostic nutritional indexSystemic inflammatory response index

Identifiers

PMID39734462
PMCPMC11650238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.