Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39734434›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2024

Comparative analysis of conventional laparoscopic surgery and single-incision laparoscopic surgery in gastric cancer treatment: Outcomes and prognosis.

Ce Cao, Xue Tian, Xue-Zhao Wang, Qing Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ce CaoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zibo Central Hospital, Zibo 255036, Shandong Province, China.
Xue TianDepartment of Oncology, Zibo Central Hospital, Zibo 255036, Shandong Province, China.
Xue-Zhao WangDepartment of Urology Surgery, Zibo Central Hospital, Zibo 255036, Shandong Province, China.
Qing WangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Zibo Central Hospital, Zibo 255036, Shandong Province, China. egx550@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastric cancer surgery has advanced with minimally invasive techniques. This study compares outcomes between single-incision laparoscopic surgery plus one port (SILS + 1) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) in treating gastric cancer.

aimTo explore the curative effect of SILS + 1 and CLS on gastric cancer and their influences on prognosis.

methodsA total of 93 patients with gastric cancer undergoing radical gastrectomy in the hospital were retrospectively analyzed between September 2019 and September 2022. According to different surgical methods, they were divided into SILS + 1 group (

resultsIntraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the SILS + 1 group (76.53 ± 8.12 mL) compared to the CLS group (108.67 ± 12.34 mL,

conclusionSILS + 1 and CLS have the comparable lymph node clearance effect in patients with gastric cancer. However, SILS + 1 is more beneficial to reduce intraoperative blood loss, relieve pain, alleviate stress response, reduce the incidence of complications and promote rapid postoperative recovery.

Indexed as

Conventional laparoscopic surgeryGastric cancerRadical gastrectomyRecurrenceSingle-incision laparoscopic surgery + 1 port

Identifiers

PMID39734434
PMCPMC11650222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.