Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39734408›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024

Comparative analysis of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors/angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction.

Chia-Chen Lee, David Te-Wei Kuan, Kai-Chun Chang, Zheng-Wei Chen, Jen-Fang Cheng, Ting-Tse Lin, Lian-Yu Lin, Cho-Kai Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chia-Chen Lee *Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
David Te-Wei Kuan *Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Kai-Chun ChangDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Zheng-Wei ChenDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jen-Fang ChengDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ting-Tse LinDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Lian-Yu LinDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Cho-Kai WuDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: To clarify the efficacy of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors/angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (RASI/ARNI) in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF). Methods: This study assessed the association between these medications and outcomes in HFmrEF using data from the National Taiwan University Hospital-integrated Medical Database. The primary outcome was cardiovascular mortality/heart failure hospitalization (HHF). Inverse probability of treatment weighting balanced baseline patient characteristics. The exposure of primary interest was use of MRA and use of RASI/ARNI, while the non-user group was also likely to receive other heart failure medication treatment. Results: Among 2,584 HFmrEF patients, 17% received MRA and 43% received RASI/ARNI. Predictors of MRA use included older age, slightly higher ejection fraction, and lower NT-proBNP level. RASI/ARNI use was predicted by higher BMI, lower NT-proBNP level, normal uric acid and potassium levels. MRA use was not associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular death [hazard ratio = 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78-1.02] or HHF (hazard ratio = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.94-1.09). Conversely, RASI//ARNI use was linked to a lower risk of cardiovascular death (hazard ratio = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.71-0.94) but not HHF (hazard ratio = 0.995, 95% CI: 0.924-1.07). Landmark analysis showed no significant difference in outcomes for follow-up durations exceeding 2 years. Conclusion: MRA had a neutral effect on cardiovascular death and HHF, while RASI/ARNI was associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular death. RASI/ARNI may be more beneficial than MRA for HFmrEF patients. Regular re-evaluation is essential to adjust heart failure treatment.

Indexed as

angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitorcardiovascular outcomesHFmrEFMRA (magnetic resonance angiography)reninangiotensin system inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID39734408
PMCPMC11671259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.