ArticleTherapeutic advances in chronic disease2024
Improving diagnosis of primary aldosteronism through education: a modified Delphi study to identify key learning points.
Article in Therapeutic advances in chronic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most common endocrine cause of secondary hypertension and can be effectively managed, or even cured, with targeted treatment. Despite this, it remains largely undiagnosed leaving a significant patient population with resistant hypertension and modifiable cardiovascular risk. Objective: To determine expert consensus on key information about PA that should ideally be taught to medical students as a step toward improving the detection of this common, underdiagnosed, and often easily treated condition. Design: The study employed a modified Delphi method which consisted of three rounds, the first of which contained an open-ended question about key areas that experts believe to be most important for inclusion in medical teaching resources and then progressing to assessment of individual versus group rankings of consensus items. Experts included both clinician-educator-researchers and patients with lived experience. Results: Nine critical knowledge areas in epidemiology, diagnostics, and pathophysiology were identified by the Delphi as consensus items, with the highest ranked being: "PA is common but often under-diagnosed - think about it with every hypertensive patient." Conclusion: Experts reached a consensus, for the first time, on nine critical knowledge areas about PA that should be covered in medical education. Importantly, the consensus accounted for patients' values and decisions. The results of this study could be used to assess medical student knowledge and their learning resources to facilitate curriculum development and medical resource updates to ensure the timely and accurate diagnosis of PA in hypertensive patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.