ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2024
Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Infant Motor Activity Log in infants with upper extremity functional asymmetry: how often and how well?
Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/aim: Functional asymmetry in the upper extremities may occur in infants with neuromotor problems due to neurodevelopmental or musculoskeletal disorders. The aim of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Infant Motor Activity Log (IMAL-T), which assesses the frequency (how often) and quality (how well) of the affected arm usage during activities in infants with functional asymmetry in the upper extremities. Materials and methods: The IMAL-T was administered face-to-face to the parents of 102 infants [60 infants at high risk of developing cerebral palsy (CP) and 42 infants with brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI)], aged 6-24 months, with functional asymmetry in the upper extremities. One week later, the IMAL-T was administered again to 22 parents to determine the test-retest reliability. Cronbach's alpha and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to determine the internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Discriminant validity was assessed using the manual ability level (Mini Manual Ability Classification System) and the nerve injury type was evaluated using the independent samples t test. For concurrent validity, the relationship between the IMAL-T and the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) self-care was examined using Spearman's correlation coefficient. Results: Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ≥ 0.91) and test-retest reliability (ICC ≥ 0.93) of the IMAL-T were adequate. The IMAL-T scores differed according to the mini-MACS and nerve injury type (p < 0.05). Moderate to strong (CP, r ≥ 0.706, p < 0.001; BPBI, r ≥ 0.579, p < 0.001) correlation coefficients were found between the IMAL-T and PEDI self-care scores. Conclusion: The IMAL-T is a reliable and valid parent-reported outcome measure that indicates the frequency and quality of the affected arm use during age-appropriate real-life activity in infants aged 6-24 months with upper extremity functional asymmetry due to neuromotor problems. The IMAL-T can be used in early intervention to assess upper extremity functional asymmetry in Turkish infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.