ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2024
Factors associated with morbidity of a totally implantable venous access device in patients with breast cancer.
Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Implantable Ports vs Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in Breast Cancer Chemotherapy: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/aim: To investigate the possible morbidities associated with the implantation of a totally implantable venous access device (TIVAD) in breast cancer (BC) patients. Materials and methods: Clinical data and developed complications in 546 BC patients with TIVAD between 2017 and 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Among these, 524 (96%) patients who underwent TIVAD implantation via the right subclavian vein (SCV) route were examined separately. Results: The mean patient age was 56.1 ± 11.4 years, and the mean patient body mass index was 25.3 ± 6.5. The incidence of early complications was 2.3% (12 cases), and the late complication incident rate was 2.6% (14 cases). Among these complications, ten (1.9%) catheter-related infections developed more frequently than others. Early complications increased as the number of puncture attempts rose and decreased with ultrasound guidance in the implantation, but no other predictive factors increased. No correlation existed between the patients' age, body mass index, BC side, puncture method, puncture number, surgical approach, radiotherapy, and late complications. There was no evidence that postoperative effects specific to BC surgery, such as increased pain, decreased functional capacity, and lymphedema, were altered with TIVAD implantation. For catheter-related infections only, adjuvant radiotherapy was a risk factor for patients with various comorbidities. Conclusion: This study concludes that the right SCV approach remains a morbidity-safe route for TIVAD implantation in BC patients, as in other malignancies. The study suggests that clinicians can use other implantation routes to avoid catheter-related infection in patients scheduled for neoadjuvant treatment, who also have morbidity, and who are likely to receive postoperative radiotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.