ArticleJournal of surgical oncology2025
A Single Institution Experience With Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction: Impact of Insurance Coverage on Risk Reduction.
Article in Journal of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction (ILR) for the Prevention of Lymphedema: A Meta-analysis of Prospective Clinical Trials.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Pharmacotherapy agents in prevention and treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic scoping review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesImmediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) performed to prevent breast cancer related lymphedema is not consistently covered by insurance payors in the United States.
methodsRetrospective review was performed on a prospective database of ILR candidates from 2018 to 2022. Candidates were identified as patients with clinical axillary lymph node involvement at the time of breast cancer diagnosis. Patient demographics, insurance type, and development of lymphedema were recorded.
resultsOne hundred and eighty ILR candidates were identified, 50 of whom underwent ILR. Non-ILR patients were more likely to be of black race, have Medicaid health insurance, earn lower median household income, and have lower rates of out-of-pocket payment when not covered by insurance. In 40 cases where ILR was indicated but not performed, 55% were due to financial reasons. After a minimum of 1 year follow up, 14.6% (6/41) of patients who underwent ILR had lymphedema, compared with 12.5% (9/72) of patients who had no clinical indication for ILR and 40% (10/25) of patients who did not undergo ILR when clinically indicated (p = 0.012).
conclusionsDisparities in insurance coverage and financial resources may adversely impact access and outcomes in patients clinically indicated for ILR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.