Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39734268›Full record

ArticleThe Veterinary record2025

Factors influencing the nature of client complaint behaviour in the aftermath of adverse events.

Julie Gibson, Kate White, Liz Mossop, Marnie L Brennan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Veterinary record, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julie GibsonSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5067-974X
Kate WhiteSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1439-0228
Liz MossopSheffield Hallam University, City Campus, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1317-1856
Marnie L BrennanSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4893-6583

Funding

School of Veterinary Medicine and ScienceUniversity of NottinghamVeterinary Defence Society
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNegative veterinary client complaint behaviour poses wellbeing and reputational risks. Adverse events are one source of complaint. Identifying factors that influence adverse event-related complaint behaviour is key to mitigating detrimental consequences and harnessing information that can be used to improve service quality, patient safety and business sustainability.

methodsInterviews were conducted with five veterinary client complainants and five veterinary client mediators. Qualitative content analysis of the transcripts was used to identify categories of capability, opportunity and motivation influencing client behaviour. One category of motivation identified focused on the desired outcomes of complainants. Two hundred and eighty resolved veterinary‒client mediation cases related to adverse events subsequently underwent content analysis to quantify these desired outcomes.

resultsClient complaint behaviour was motivated by clients' emotional reactions, perceptions and beliefs and desire to achieve an outcome as a result, and was influenced by previous complaint experience, technological ability, self-confidence and broader organisational and societal factors. Although financial redress was the most commonly identified desired outcome, apology, honesty, accountability and prevention of future events were valued. LIMITATIONS: Small data sets and interpretative analyses limit the generalisability of the findings.

conclusionsProactively engaging clients in relation to adverse events is likely to reduce negative complaint behaviour and facilitate veterinary quality improvement.

Indexed as

Medical ErrorsVeterinary MedicineAnimalsFemaleHumansMaleMotivationQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID39734268
PMCPMC11907750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.