ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2024
Palliative endoscopic treatment of malignant central airway obstruction.
Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bronchoscopic intervention in the management of primary tracheobronchial adenoid cystic carcinoma with dyspnea.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Long-Segment Malignant Tracheal Stenosis from Recurrent Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma Successfully Palliated with a Covered Self-Expanding Metallic Stent: A Case Report.Case reports in oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo examine the outcome of palliative endoscopic treatment of malignant central airway obstruction (CAO) and identify predictors for Days Alive and Out of Hospital (DAOH), overall survival and treatment related complications.
methodsConsecutive adult patients treated endoscopically for malignant CAO at Aarhus University Hospital from 2012 to 2022 were included in the study. Statistical analyses were carried out to identify predictors for DAOH, survival and complications.
results127 consecutive patients met the inclusion criteria. The majority of patients were categorised with stage IV lung cancer, the majority being males, with a median age of 67 years. The endoscopic interventions were mainly tumour debulking combined with airway stent insertion or tumour debulking alone. The complication rate was 21.0% and the mortality rate was 3.9%. In total, 89.8% of the patients experienced symptom relief following surgery, and the majority (92.1%) were discharged from hospital within two days after intervention. Mean survival time following intervention was 144 days, mean DAOH
conclusionEndoscopic palliative treatment of malignant CAO is generally feasible and safe, offering symptom relief in most cases. The method is considered an effective measure for short to median term palliation of respiratory distress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.