Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39733440›Full record

ReviewAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2024

Update on Occupational Cancer for Better Cancer Prevention and Control.

Chatchai Ekpanyaskul

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Chatchai EkpanyaskulDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-2906-9832

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Occupational cancer remains an ongoing and emerging issue in cancer prevention and control and is more easily preventable in practice than other causes. As of 2024, changes in various aspects, such as methods for estimating the burden of cancer, evidence on novel carcinogens and classification systems, modernization of working conditions, job characteristics, occupational exposure, and societal changes have played a significant role. Furthermore, advances in technology, including wearable devices, exposome, and biomedical technology, offer more precise methods for identifying the associations between occupational carcinogens and cancer. Diagnosing occupational cancer and investigating clusters are crucial for understanding its etiology. Prevention at every level- from primary to quarterly prevention- and promotional activities are crucial for exposed workers, often outweighing the importance of treatment, which can be costly. This updated information, as reviewed in this article, and cooperative work with occupational medicine physicians, could contribute to improving clinical practices for better cancer prevention and control.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposureCarcinogensHumansCarcinogenscanceroccupational carcinogenoccupational medicinePrevention and control

Identifiers

PMID39733440
PMCPMC12008330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.