ArticleScientific reports2024
Spongy-looking microfabrics in the earliest named stromatolite represent deep burial alteration and incipient metamorphism.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The earliest named stromatolite Cryptozoon Hall, 1884 (Late Cambrian, ca. 490 Ma, eastern New York State), was recently re-interpreted as an interlayered microbial mat and non-spiculate (keratosan) sponge deposit. This "classic stromatolite" is prominent in a fundamental debate concerning the significance or even existence of non-spiculate sponges in carbonate rocks from the Neoproterozoic (Tonian) onwards. Cryptozoon has three types of microbially-induced carbonate layers: clotted-pelletoidal micrite with microbial filaments, clotted-pelletoidal micrite with vesicular structure, and dense microcrystalline laminae. A fourth, stratiform to patchy fabric comprises suspect sponges. Using contextual fabric analysis, elemental mapping, cathodoluminescence, fluid inclusions, electron backscatter diffraction, U-Pb dating, and burial history, the sponge interpretation is denied. Neither a distinct sponge body outline nor a canal system is identifiable. Instead, the suspect fabric is secondary in origin, and best explained as a product of Carboniferous (Mississippian) deep burial alteration associated with basement reactivation. Key petrographic observations include heterogenous recrystallization via aggrading Ostwald ripening with interfingering reaction fronts typical for partially miscible fluids, a granoblastic calcite texture (incipient metamorphism), and subsequent hypidioblastic white mica (arguably Carboniferous/Permian, Alleghenian orogeny). Topotype Cryptozoon is a stromatolite altered to sub-greenschist metacarbonate. The published Tonian to Phanerozoic record of interpreted non-spiculate sponges requires reassessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.