ArticleScientific reports2024
Optimizing T cell inflamed signature through a combination biomarker approach for predicting immunotherapy response in NSCLC.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging the unique properties of RNA aptamers to quantify the fraction of receptors occupied by ligands.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2026Article
- Biomarker guided combination strategies and perioperative integration for immune cold microsatellite stable colorectal cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Article
- Integrating chemokine signatures and multi-omic biomarkers to predict immunotherapy response in non-small cell lung cancer: a comprehensive narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Can tissue immune states shape the risk of hyperprogressive disease?Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The introduction of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies revolutionized treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet response rates remain modest, underscoring the need for predictive biomarkers. While a T cell inflamed gene expression profile (GEP) has predicted anti-PD-1 response in various cancers, it failed in a large NSCLC cohort from the Stand Up To Cancer-Mark (SU2C-MARK) Foundation. Re-analysis revealed that while the T cell inflamed GEP alone was not predictive, its performance improved significantly when combined with gene signatures of myeloid cell markers. These additional signatures, however, showed negative contributions to prediction, hinting at immune alterations affecting therapy. Based on this, we proposed a combination biomarker approach that integrates the T cell inflamed GEP with immune-altered signatures, derived from the SU2C-MARK cohort using a machine-learning approach, as novel biomarkers. These signatures consisted of genes highly expressed in myeloid and stromal cells. We then assessed the predictive ability of these combined biomarkers in six independent cancer cohorts treated with anti-PD-1. The combined biomarkers demonstrated enhanced performance in NSCLC and gastric cancer cohorts, but not in melanoma cohorts. Our study introduces new biomarkers for predicting anti-PD-(L)1 response in NSCLC and offers mechanistic insights into treatment efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.