Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39733161›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Soil application of dazomet combined with 1,3-dichloropropene against soilborne pests for tomato production.

Liangang Mao, Xingang Liu, Muhammad Umair Sial, Lan Zhang, Lizhen Zhu, Chi Wu, Aocheng Cao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Liangang MaoState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Disease and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, People's Republic of China.
Xingang LiuState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Disease and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, People's Republic of China. liuxingangal@caas.cn.
Muhammad Umair SialDepartment of Entomology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, 38000, Pakistan.
Lan ZhangState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Disease and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, People's Republic of China.
Lizhen ZhuState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Disease and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, People's Republic of China.
Chi WuState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Disease and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, People's Republic of China.
Aocheng CaoState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Disease and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, People's Republic of China.

Funding

National Key R&D Program of China 2016YFD0200500National Natural Science Foundation of China 32372604Program on Substituted Technology for Methyl Bromide in China 2110402
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a growing problem in China, whereby tomato replant disease is being affected by Fusarium spp., Meloidogyne spp., and Phytophthora spp. To address these pests that live in the soil, we evaluated how well applying a dazomet (DZ) and 1,3-dichloropropene (1,3-D) combination directly to the soil works in three different tomato trials. The combined treatment of DZ + 1,3-D (25 + 10 g a.i. m⁻²), applied at a 50% reduction rate, effectively decreased Meloidogyne spp. populations in the soil by more than 94%. This resulted in low root galling indices of 2.67%, 4.17%, and 10.83% in the different trials. In addition, it significantly decreased the number of Fusarium spp. and Phytophthora spp. colonies by more than 82%, resulting in low root disease indices of 3.33%, 10.00%, and 10.42%, respectively. This also greatly increased tomato yield and profit for growers. The results obtained with DZ alone and methyl bromide (MB) at 50 g a.i. m⁻² were similar. However, these results were better than those obtained with 1,3-D at 20 g a.i. m⁻² alone in controlling soilborne fungi in trials I and III. Compared to the untreated controls and the soil solarization disinfestation treatments, all the chemical treatments performed significantly better. Due to its effectiveness in controlling pests and its economic advantages, soil fumigation with DZ + 1,3-D (25 + 10 g a.i. m⁻²) is recommended in pest management programs for tomato cultivation in China. This treatment is highly effective in managing pests that reside in the soil.

Indexed as

Allyl CompoundsFusariumHydrocarbons, ChlorinatedPlant DiseasesSoilSolanum lycopersicumThiadiazinesTylenchoideaAnimalsFungicides, IndustrialPest ControlPhytophthoraPlant RootsSoil Microbiology1,3-dichloro-1-propeneAllyl CompoundsdazometFungicides, IndustrialHydrocarbons, ChlorinatedSoilThiadiazines

Identifiers

PMID39733161
PMCPMC11682314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.