ArticleScientific reports2024
Soil application of dazomet combined with 1,3-dichloropropene against soilborne pests for tomato production.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Soil Fumigant-Mediated Changes in the Microbial Communities of Soil with Continuous Cropping on Tomato Yield and Soil-Borne Diseases.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Effects of the Addition of Microbial Agents After Dazomet Fumigation on the Microbial Community Structure in Soils with Continuous Cropping of Strawberry (Microorganisms · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is a growing problem in China, whereby tomato replant disease is being affected by Fusarium spp., Meloidogyne spp., and Phytophthora spp. To address these pests that live in the soil, we evaluated how well applying a dazomet (DZ) and 1,3-dichloropropene (1,3-D) combination directly to the soil works in three different tomato trials. The combined treatment of DZ + 1,3-D (25 + 10 g a.i. m⁻²), applied at a 50% reduction rate, effectively decreased Meloidogyne spp. populations in the soil by more than 94%. This resulted in low root galling indices of 2.67%, 4.17%, and 10.83% in the different trials. In addition, it significantly decreased the number of Fusarium spp. and Phytophthora spp. colonies by more than 82%, resulting in low root disease indices of 3.33%, 10.00%, and 10.42%, respectively. This also greatly increased tomato yield and profit for growers. The results obtained with DZ alone and methyl bromide (MB) at 50 g a.i. m⁻² were similar. However, these results were better than those obtained with 1,3-D at 20 g a.i. m⁻² alone in controlling soilborne fungi in trials I and III. Compared to the untreated controls and the soil solarization disinfestation treatments, all the chemical treatments performed significantly better. Due to its effectiveness in controlling pests and its economic advantages, soil fumigation with DZ + 1,3-D (25 + 10 g a.i. m⁻²) is recommended in pest management programs for tomato cultivation in China. This treatment is highly effective in managing pests that reside in the soil.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.