ArticleScientific reports2024
On machine learnability of local contributions to interatomic potentials from density functional theory calculations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Machine learning interatomic potentials, as a modern generation of classical force fields, take atomic environments as input and predict the corresponding atomic energies and forces. We challenge the commonly accepted assumption that the contribution of an atom can be learned from the short-range local environment of that atom. We employ density functional theory calculations to quantify the decay of the induced electron density and electrostatic potential in response to local perturbations throughout insulating, semiconducting and metallic samples of different dimensionalities. Molecules and thin layers are shown to fail keeping such disturbances localized. Therefore, the learnability of local atomic contributions, which guarantees scalability and transferability of a machine learning interatomic potential, is questionable in the case of molecules and low-dimensional samples. Similarly, the induced electrostatic effects due to substituted impurities or vacancy sites in a crystalline bulk are weakly damped and remain significant beyond several interatomic distances. However, geometric deformations in bulks are practically local within the first neighbors and induce a Yukawa-type electrostatic potential that exponentially vanishes. The practical importance of this finding is that it limits the application of the machine learning interatomic potentials to conformational search or thermal properties of bulk materials and so on, where only purely geometrical deformations are involved. Once chemically impactful defects like aliovalent impurities or vacancies are present, the interatomic potentials trained on local environments need to be corrected for long-range effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.