Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39733077›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Water quality prediction and carbon reduction mechanisms in wastewater treatment in Northwest cities using Random Forest Regression model.

Jingjing Sun, Xin Guan, Xiaojun Sun, Xiaojing Cao, Yepei Tan, Jiarong Liao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Integrating Plant-Based Coagulation and Explainable Machine Learning for Sustainable River Water Treatment.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Feature-engineered machine learning for daily-scale prediction of effluent total phosphorus and coagulant dosing optimization in full-scale DAF systems.Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jingjing Sun *School of Public Administration, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Xin Guan *Guangzhou Xinhua University, Dongguan, 523133, China.
Xiaojun SunSchool of Foreign Languages, Hubei University of Economics, Wuhan, 430205, China. sunxiaojun@hbue.edu.cn.
Xiaojing Cao *Master of Business Administration, London Metropolitan University, London, N7 8DB, UK.
Yepei TanCyberspace Institute of Advanced Technology, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Jiarong LiaoSchool of Public Administration, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 20CGL011the Ministry of Education Industry-Academia Cooperation and Collaborative Talent Cultivation Project 231101339153047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the accelerated urbanization and economic development in Northwest China, the efficiency of urban wastewater treatment and the importance of water quality management have become increasingly significant. This work aims to explore urban wastewater treatment and carbon reduction mechanisms in Northwest China to alleviate water resource pressure. By utilizing online monitoring data from pilot systems, it conducts an in-depth analysis of the impacts of different wastewater treatment processes on water quality parameters. This work pays particular attention to their impact on key indicators such as Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), NH

Indexed as

Carbon emission reduction mechanismPredictive modelsRandom Forest RegressionWastewater treatmentWater quality indicators

Identifiers

PMID39733077
PMCPMC11682117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.