Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39733067›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2024

The Italian Crowdsourcing Project: Visual word recognition times for 130,495 Italian words.

Simona Amenta, Andrea Gregor de Varda, Pawel Mandera, Emmanuel Keuleers, Marc Brysbaert, Marco Marelli

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Simona AmentaDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, P.zza dell'Ateneo Nuovo, 1, 20126, Milano, Italy. simona.amenta@unimib.it.ORCID 0000-0003-0391-6164
Andrea Gregor de VardaDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, P.zza dell'Ateneo Nuovo, 1, 20126, Milano, Italy.
Pawel ManderaLingvist Technologies, Tallinn, Estonia.
Emmanuel KeuleersDepartment of Cognitive Science and Artificial Intelligence, University of Tilburg, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Marc BrysbaertDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Marco MarelliDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, P.zza dell'Ateneo Nuovo, 1, 20126, Milano, Italy.

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 3G011617W
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite being largely spoken and studied by language and cognitive scientists, Italian lacks large resources of language processing data. The Italian Crowdsourcing Project (ICP) is a dataset of word recognition times and accuracy including responses to 130,465 words, which makes it the largest dataset of its kind item-wise. The data were collected in an online word knowledge task in which over 156,000 native speakers of Italian took part. We validated the ICP dataset by (1) showing that ICP reaction times correlate strongly (r = .78) with lexical decision latencies collected in a traditional lab experiment, (2) showing that the effect of major psycholinguistic variables (e.g., frequency, length, etc.) can be replicated in this dataset, and (3) replicating the effect of word prevalence, which we compute here for the first time for Italian. Given the inclusion of many inflectional forms of verbs, adjectives, and nouns, we further showcase the potential of this dataset by exploring two phenomena (inflectional entropy in verb paradigms and the clitic effect in isolated word recognition) that build on the peculiar properties of Italian. In this paper we present the ICP resource and release response times, accuracy, and prevalence estimates for all the words included.

Indexed as

CrowdsourcingLanguagePsycholinguisticsReaction TimeAdultFemaleHumansItalyMaleReadingRecognition, PsychologyVocabularyCrowdsourcingLexical decisionMegastudyPrevalenceWord recognition

Identifiers

PMID39733067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.