ArticleScientific reports2024
Synthetic polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography using contrastive unpaired translation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiparametric dynamic optical coherence tomography for evaluation of human cardiac organoids subjected to external stress.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Label-free mid-infrared dichroism-sensitive photoacoustic microscopy for histostructural analysis of engineered heart tissues.Light, science & applications · 2026Article
- A comprehensive review of high-performance photoacoustic microscopy systems.Photoacoustics · 2025Review
- Evaluation of retinal pigment epithelium changes in serous pigment epithelial detachment using synthesized multi-contrast polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Label-free optical microscopy with artificial intelligence: a new paradigm in pathology.Biophotonics discovery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography (PS-OCT) measures the polarization state of backscattered light from tissues and provides valuable insights into the birefringence properties of biological tissues. Contrastive unpaired translation (CUT) was used in this study to generate a synthetic PS-OCT image from a single OCT image. The challenges related to extensive data requirements relying on labeled datasets using only pixel-wise correlations that make it difficult to efficiently regenerate the periodic patterns observed in PS-OCT images were addressed. The CUT model captures birefringence patterns by leveraging patch-wise correlations from unpaired data, which allows learning of the underlying structural features of biological tissues responsible for birefringence. To demonstrate the performance of the proposed approach, three generative models (Pix2pix, CycleGAN, and CUT) were compared on an in vivo dataset of injured mouse tendons over a six-week healing period. CUT outperformed Pix2pix and CycleGAN by producing high-fidelity synthetic PS-OCT images that closely matched the original PS-OCT images. Pearson correlation and two-way ANOVA tests confirmed the superior performance of CUT (p-value < 0.0001) over the comparison models. Additionally, a ResNet-152 classification model was used to assess tissue damage, which achieved an accuracy of up to 90.13% compared to the original PS-OCT images. This research demonstrates that CUT is superior to conventional methods for generating high-quality synthetic PS-OCT images and offers better improvements in most scenarios, in terms of efficiency and image fidelity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.