ArticleScientific reports2024
Hyperelastic models for the human zona pellucida and their implications on shear modulus estimation in the clinical practice.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The human Zona-Pellucida shear modulus before and after fertilization and its implications in IVF embryo selection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Dynamic Remodeling of the Zona Pellucida: Implications for Oocyte Competence and Assisted Reproduction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It has long been speculated that the mechanical properties of the human oocyte can be an indicator for oocyte viability. Recent studies have demonstrated that embryo implantation rates, following Intra-Cytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) procedures, may be increased if the shear modulus value of the oocyte Zona Pellucida (ZP) is taken into consideration during embryo transfer. The shear modulus was determined by an iterative oocyte specific finite element (FE) analysis based on the clinical ICSI data. Nevertheless, the results obtained from the computational analysis may depend on the choice of the constitutive model used for the ZP. In the current study, three different hyper-elastic strain energy density functions (SEDF's) are considered. The Neo-Hookean (NH), Mooney-Rivlin (MR) and Ogden models (OG) were used to determine the ZP shear modulus from ICSI clinical data. The sensitivity of each SEDF in extracting the oocyte specific shear modulus is examined, for the first time. It is demonstrated that the NH and MR models are more sensitive than the OG model for determining the ZP shear modulus from clinical ICSI data. It is also demonstrated that the accuracy of ZP shear modulus identification process greatly depends on the value of suction pressure applied during the ICSI procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.