Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39733025›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Comparison of the aquatic toxicity of diquat and its metabolites to zebrafish Danio rerio.

Lanxin Shi, Xinru Wang, Yaoyao Dai, Wendong Zhou, Shenggan Wu, Bo Shao, Gorettie Nsubuga Nabanoga, Chenyang Ji, Meirong Zhao

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lanxin ShiKey Laboratory of Pollution Exposure and Health Intervention of Zhejiang Province, Interdisciplinary Research Academy, Zhejiang Shuren University, Hangzhou, 310015, People's Republic of China.
Xinru WangTea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou, 310008, People's Republic of China.
Yaoyao DaiKey Laboratory of Microbial Technology for Industrial Pollution Control of Zhejiang Province, College of Environment, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, 310014, People's Republic of China.
Wendong ZhouKey Laboratory of Pollution Exposure and Health Intervention of Zhejiang Province, Interdisciplinary Research Academy, Zhejiang Shuren University, Hangzhou, 310015, People's Republic of China.
Shenggan WuState Key Laboratory for Managing Biotic and Chemical Threats to the Quality and Safety of Agro-Products, Institute of Agro-Product Safety and Nutrition, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou, 310021, People's Republic of China.
Bo ShaoCollege of Biological and Environmental Engineering, Zhejiang Shuren University, Hangzhou, 310015, People's Republic of China.
Gorettie Nsubuga NabanogaCollege of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Makerere University, 999123, Kampala, Uganda.
Chenyang JiKey Laboratory of Pollution Exposure and Health Intervention of Zhejiang Province, Interdisciplinary Research Academy, Zhejiang Shuren University, Hangzhou, 310015, People's Republic of China. jichenyang@zjsru.edu.cn.
Meirong ZhaoKey Laboratory of Microbial Technology for Industrial Pollution Control of Zhejiang Province, College of Environment, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, 310014, People's Republic of China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province Q22B070573Youth Foundation of National Natural Science Foundation of China 22106142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diquat (DQ) is a non-selective, fast-acting herbicide that is extensively used in aquatic systems. DQ has been registered as the substitute for paraquat due to its lower toxicity. However, the widespread presence of DQ in aquatic systems can pose an ecological burden on aquatic organisms. In addition, DQ can degrade into its metabolites, diquat-monopyridone (DQ-M) and diquat-dipyridone (DQ-D) in the environment, while the ecological risks of the metabolites remain uncertain. Herein, the aquatic ecological risks of DQ and its metabolites were compared using zebrafish as model non-target organisms. Results indicated that DQ and its metabolites did not induce significant acute toxicity to zebrafish embryos at environmentally relevant levels. However, exposure to DQ and DQ-D resulted in oxidative stress in zebrafish larvae. DQ treatment led to increased levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), malondialdehyde (MDA), and glutathione (GSH) in the larvae, while DQ-D increased internal MDA and GSH levels. Moreover, the activities of the antioxidative enzymes, superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) were significantly suppressed by DQ and DQ-D. Besides, the expression levels of oxidative stress-related genes (Mn-SOD, CAT, and GPX) were disturbed accordingly after DQ and DQ-D treatments. These findings highlighted the importance of a more comprehensive understanding of the ecological risks of agrochemical substitutions as well as agrochemical metabolites. Such knowledge is crucial for significant improvements in agrochemical regulation and policy-making in the future.

Indexed as

DiquatHerbicidesOxidative StressWater Pollutants, ChemicalZebrafishAnimalsCatalaseEmbryo, NonmammalianGlutathioneLarvaMalondialdehydeReactive Oxygen SpeciesSuperoxide DismutaseCatalaseDiquatGlutathioneHerbicidesMalondialdehydeReactive Oxygen SpeciesSuperoxide DismutaseWater Pollutants, ChemicalDiquatEcological riskOxidative stressPesticide metabolitesZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID39733025
PMCPMC11682118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.