ArticleScientific reports2024
Predicting the toxic side effects of drug interactions using chemical structures and protein sequences.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Computational approaches for drug-drug interaction prediction: a systematic review of data sources, modeling strategies, and evaluation frameworks.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Machine learning and deep learning-based drug-drug interactions prediction: a systematic review focused on anticancer drugs.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Mapping the Global Research on Drug-Drug Interactions: A Multidecadal Evolution Through AI-Driven Terminology Standardization.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The study aims to address the critical issue of toxic side effects resulting from drug combinations, which can significantly increase health risks, clinical complications, and lead to drug being withdrawn from the market. A model named TSEDDI (toxic side effects of drug-drug interaction) has been developed to improve the identification of drug pairs that may induce toxicity or adverse reactions. By utilizing drug chemical structures and diverse proteins, we employ a convolutional neural network (CNN) to extract features from molecular images, enzyme proteins, transporter proteins, and target proteins. Furthermore, we introduce a weighted binary cross entropy loss function to tackle class imbalance and integrate the multi-head attention mechanism with residual connections to enhance model performance. Our model outperformed advanced baseline models in predicting drug-drug interaction (DDI) side effects, achieving an accuracy of 0.9059 (± 0.0010) and consistently excelling across various evaluation metrics. The case study confirms the potential mechanisms by which four pairs of drugs cause side effects, thus demonstrating the effectiveness of our model in predicting DDI side effects. The TSEDDI model combines multiple attention mechanisms and residual connections, enhancing its ability to detect toxic and adverse effects related to DDIs. As a result, it becomes a valuable resource for promptly identifying adverse reactions in clinical trials. Future research could investigate drug substructures prone to toxic side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.