ArticleScientific reports2024
Developmental validation of a novel all-in one assay of X chromosomal multi-insertion/deletion loci for forensic genetics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multi-insertion/deletion polymorphisms (Multi-InDels), as the novel genetic markers, show great potential in forensic research. Whereas, forensic researchers mainly focus on the multi-InDels on the autosomes, which can provide relatively limited information in some complex paternity cases. In this study, a novel X chromosomal multi-InDel multiplex amplification system was designed, containing 22 multi-InDels and one STR locus on the X chromosome. In order to verify the applicability and effectiveness of the novel system, the sensitivity, species specificity, repeatability, stability, and precision of the panel were verified. The results showed that the novel developed multiplex amplification system could still obtain complete allele profile at 62.5pg of template DNA and showed good tolerance to six common inhibitors. Meanwhile, the analyses of case samples showed that the system performed well on biological samples commonly found in forensic cases. The combined power of discrimination for males and females in the Guizhou Han population was greater than 0.999999999. Besides, the combined mean exclusion chance of these 23 loci exceeded 0.9999 in the trios and the duos. In conclusion, the multiplex amplification system is sensitive, precision, reproducible, and informative, which could be used as a high-efficient tool for complex kinship identification and personal identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.