Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39732970›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Hydroxyethylamine based analog targets microtubule assembly: an in silico study for anti-cancerous drug development.

Pawan Kumar, Rajni Khan, Basant Narain Singh, Anisha Kumari, Ankit Rai, Anil Kumar Singh, Amresh Prakash, Shashikant Ray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pawan KumarSchool of Computational and Integrative Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, Delhi, 110067, India.
Rajni KhanDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Hajipur, 844102, India.
Basant Narain SinghDepartment of Botany, Pandit Deendayal Upadhyaya Shekhawati University, Sikar, Nawalgarh Road, Katrathal, Rajasthan, 332024, India.
Anisha KumariDepartment of Biotechnology, Mahatma Gandhi Central University, Motihari, 845401, India.
Ankit RaiDepartment of Medical Biotechnology, Gujrat Biotechnology University, Gandhinagar, 382355, Gujarat, India. ankit.rai@gbu.edu.in.
Anil Kumar SinghDepartment of Chemistry, Mahatma Gandhi Central University, Motihari, 845401, India. anilkumarsingh@mgcub.ac.in.
Amresh PrakashAmity Institute of Integrative Sciences and Health, Amity University Haryana, Gurugram, India. amreshprakash@jnu.ac.in.
Shashikant RayDepartment of Biotechnology, Mahatma Gandhi Central University, Motihari, 845401, India. shashikantray@mgcub.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microtubules are dynamic cytoskeletal structures essential for cell architecture, cellular transport, cell motility, and cell division. Due to their dynamic nature, known as dynamic instability, microtubules can spontaneously switch between phases of growth and shortening. Disruptions in microtubule functions have been implicated in several diseases, including cancer, neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease, and birth defects. The role of microtubules during various phases of the cell cycle, particularly in cell division, makes them attractive targets for drug development against cancer. Several successful drugs currently on the market are designed to target microtubules. However, the presence of cellular toxicity and the development of multidrug resistance necessitate the search for new microtubule-targeting drugs.Here, a library of 106 biologically active compounds were screened to identify potent microtubule assembly inhibitors. Out of all the screened compounds, the hydroxyethylamine (HEA) analogues are found to be the best hit.We identified three inhibitors, BKS3031A, BKS3045A and BKS3046A, that bind at the same site as the well-known microtubule targeting agent colchicine. These inhibitors were simulated for 100 ns with tubulin complexes, and the results indicated that they remain stable within the binding pocket of α-β tubulin complexes. In addition, we estimated the binding free energy of BKS3031A, BKS3045A and BKS3046A by using molecular mechanics generalized Born surface area (MM-GBSA) calculations, and it was found to be -32.67 ± 6.01, -21.77 ± 5.12 and - 22.92 ± 5.09 kcal/mol, respectively. Our findings suggest that these novel inhibitors have potential to bind and perturb the microtubule network, positioning them as promising microtubule-targeting agents.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsMicrotubulesBinding SitesComputer SimulationDrug DevelopmentEthylaminesHumansMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationTubulinTubulin ModulatorsAntineoplastic AgentsEthylaminesTubulinTubulin ModulatorsMD simulationMM-GBSAΑβ-tubulin

Identifiers

PMID39732970
PMCPMC11682412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.