ArticleScientific reports2024
Ceftazidime-avibactam for the treatment of febrile neutropenia in HSCT recipients and acute leukemia patients post induction chemotherapy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antimicrobial use in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in China: a retrospective multicenter cohort study.BMC pediatrics · 2026Observational
- Pathogenic profiles and antimicrobial resistance in neutropenic acute leukemia patients: diagnostic potential of sTNF-R1 and IL-8.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Newer antibiotics for drug-resistant Gram-negative infections in immunocompromised hosts: from pivotal trials to high-risk practice.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- New antibiotics targeting Gram-negative bacilli.Le infezioni in medicina · 2025Review
- Impact of ceftazidime-avibactam on mortality in bloodstream infections: a cohort study in patients with acute leukemia.Therapeutic advances in infectious diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Febrile neutropenia is a major complication in patients with acute leukemia or those undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Understanding patient characteristics and susceptibility patterns in febrile neutropenia is essential for appropriate antimicrobial therapy. First-line agents should have Pseudomonas aeruginosa coverage, but with the increase in multi-drug resistant organisms, ceftazidime-avibactam has emerged as a new therapeutic option. This retrospective case-control study included 300 admissions (143 patients) between January 2009 and December 2022. Patients with hematologic neoplasms and patients that underwent HSCT, satisfying the criteria of febrile neutropenia and treated with ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZAVI) were included and compared to controls who received the best available therapy (BAT). A bivariate regression model explored independent predictors of septic shock and mortality. Patients who received CAZAVI were more likely to have a microbiologically documented infection (59.0% vs. 28.3%). Complications were significantly more frequent in the CAZAVI group, with sepsis being the most common (59.0%). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that receiving CAZAVI was an independent risk factor for both sepsis and mortality (aOR 6.33 [95% CI 2.81-14.30] and 7.82 [2.63-23.26], respectively). Knowing common organisms and patterns of resistance, with an understanding of risk factors for morbidity and mortality, is crucial for the antimicrobial management of febrile neutropenia. Further studies on the effectiveness of CAZAVI in this population are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.